Vox Daily The Official Voices.com Blog

Video Game Voice Actors Want Bigger Piece of the Pie

By Stephanie Ciccarelli

October 12, 2007

Comments (5)

NPR LogoWill this issue ever be resolved?

What happens when video games like Halo 3 make video game production companies millions of dollars but their voice actors only see the initial session fee payments?

Potentially a strike, that's what. Check out this interview that aired on NPR on October 11th, 2007 tackling this very touchy subject.

There was an interview October 11th, on NPR (National Public Radio) in the United States hosted by Nate DiMeo featuring an interview about pay for voice actors in video games, the argument being that if blockbuster video games are earning hundreds of millions of dollars, union actors who provide voices for the characters should get a bigger share of the profits, perhaps even residuals, just as their colleagues in television get when television shows enjoy re-runs.

To hear the 3-minute interview, listen at the NPR website and then return to VOX Daily and leave your comments.

My thanks to Dan Chien for passing this story along!

If you find some news related to voice acting, you can send me your story idea or suggestion via email to stephanie@voices.com.

Steph

P.S. If you prefer, send in your feedback recorded as an MP3 and I'll air it on an upcoming episode of VOX Talk.

Related Topics: radio, union, United States, videogames


Comments


    Nope, actors should not get royalties for games.

    Unlike TV and movies, the game is not a success or failure because of the voice acting. The game is a success because of the gameplay. Players will not buy a game with bad gameplay no matter how excellent the acting. But they will buy a game with good gameplay and sub par acting. Essentially, good voice acting is important for the craft, but when it comes to sales, it's inconsequential.

    Instead, actors should know the industry and understand the reach of a particular game they're working on. Figure out the estimated sales and base buy out rates accordingly.

    Posted by:

      Not to pick a fight, but I don't think it's quite as cut-and-dried as has been suggested. One could conversely argue that TV viewers wouldn't watch a poorly-written series even if it featured the considerable acting prowess of, say, a Patrick Stewart or Liam Neeson.

      While it's true that gameplay is paramount among gamers, it's also a fact that gamers will flock to message boards and groan mightily about bad voice acting when they hear it.

      We voiceover artists keep telling neophytes that voice acting isn't just doing funny voices, that it's acting, requiring skillsets shared by stage and screen actors; it only stands to reason that we should be equivalently compensated as the latter group. It's certainly true that videogames are a different medium from film and TV, but the lines that separate them have been heavily blurred over the last several years.

      In my humble opinion, to suggest that good voice acting plays no part in the success of a game only devalues us, and further perpetuates the conventional wisdom that we're already "overpaid".

      Posted by:

        As the voice of a well known video game from EA Sports, I would have to agree with Jeffrey. The issue really is with the buy-out rate. The production companies truly do try to offer horrifically low and laughable rates and then as one company said: "Well there is so much money going into the graphics etc., that we can't pay much". In reality, it's not a "can't pay", rather it's a "don't want to pay".

        There needs to be a balance whereby talent would refuse to take laughable rates and production companies be a more "honest" in their offerings. Both of these, I'm afraid, don't happen. Until voice actors STAND...ALL OF US...stand and reject foolish rates that diminish our collective and individual value, we will be faced with issues like this more and more... after all, why pay more when you don't have to. However if we stand our ground, we can help reluctant production companies bring the scales a bit more into balance.

        I can't stress enough: THE VALUE OF VOICEOVER IS IN THE END USE OF THE PRODUCT..... NOT HOW LONG THE RECORDING IS. Thus, Mr. Kafer's remarks are accurate.

        Brian in Charlotte
        www.VoiceOverForYou.com

        Posted by:

          The argument is just an off-shoot of the union/non union question that each side asks itself after a particularly slow week (the grass is always greener...)

          Assuming that non union workers are very unlikely to get residuals, the union has to establish more equitable terms for video games. TV viewer ship is down.... waaaaay down. It's games and internet that are greatly responsible for the decline.

          Therefore, production of programming, content and advertising will be heading that way (and have been for some time); so its incumbent upon the union to set better basic terms on residuals now as even for the best voice actor (who is not a marketable Hollywood name) is unlikely to be able to negotiate a deal for points on a video game's sales.

          Best always,
          - Peter

          Posted by:

            Hey guys,

            All wonderful comments - thanks for sharing your opinions.

            As you know, there is an option to "Digg" the articles you read on VOX Daily. Someone at the Digg site recently left a comment on our post there to the effect that if voice actors are going to make a fuss about payment, developers should just go back to doing the voice acting...

            What say you, ladies and gents? You can show your support for the voice acting cause by Digging the article (voting) and or leaving a comment. To do so at Digg, you need to have an account there. Registering for one is free.

            Check it out here:

            http://digg.com/gaming_news/Video_Game_Voice_Actors_Want_Bigger_Piece_of_the_Pie

            Steph

            Posted by:

Leave a Comment



Recent Articles

Slate In Character Or Don't Slate At All

Most Common Languages Other Than English and Spanish Spoken in the US

Who's the Voice on the MLB Perfect Inning App?

Dissolve: The Rest Is History

Raise Your Recording Studio Fashion with VOXTees

3 Simple Steps to Better Communication in Voice-Overs

The 1 Thing It Takes To Be The Right Voice

Voices.com Exhibiting at VOICE 2014

Do You Know Where to Find Children's Voice Acting Jobs?

How To Cast Like Marion Dougherty

   

Translation Services

Professional Translation Services

Looking for professional translation? Voices.com Translations is provides language services including translation and localization to help you expand into new markets

Get a quote on translation services

Subscribe by Email

About Vox Daily

Vox Daily offers a daily dose of voice acting news, articles, tutorials, interviews, intelligent conversation and business ideas for voice talent and voice actors.


Follow Us

   

Our feed & social options update you with special offers and news as it happens.

New YouTube Video

Watch videos on YouTube